检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐晓燕[1] 王维民[1] 熊燕宇[1] 蒋婧[1] 潘小燕[1] 孙念红[1]
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学
出 处:《外语教学与研究》2013年第2期264-275,320,共12页Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基 金:夏伟蓉主持的国家社科基金一般项目"我国大学生英语句法能力与句法多样性的相关研究"(09BYY065);徐晓燕主持的教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"单位长度;单位密度和句式类型--对我国英语学习者英语句法复杂性的研究"(10YJA740108)资助
摘 要:本研究对比分析中国英语专业学生与英语本族语者在议论文中句法复杂性的差异。指标有单位长度(W/T和W/C)、单位密度(C/T和DC/C)、四类句子、从句、紧缩子句和限定与非限定动词的被动形式。结果表明,中国英语专业学生的单位长度和密度与语言能力变化方向一致。长度指标显著低于本族语者,密度在多数情况下也显著偏小。简单句在4年级和写作高分组下降显著,状语、宾语和表语从句随年级的升高只呈下降趋势。中国学生对上述句型的使用显著多于本族语者。紧缩子句和被动句只在写作高分组中显著增多,但低于本族语者。This paper reports the differences in syntactic complexity between essays written by Chinese students of English and by native English speakers.'Syntactic complexity' includes the length of T units(W/T) and clauses(W/C),embeddedness — the ratios of clauses to T units(C/T) and of dependent clauses to clauses(DC/C),and syntactic structures covering independent and dependent clauses,passives and reduced structures.The results reveal that the length and embeddedness indexes increase in line with their English proficiency.Compared with native speakers,the length indexes demonstrated by the Chinese students are significantly lower and the embeddedness indexes show a similar tendency in most cases.The use of adverbial,object and complement clauses shows an insignificant decline as the Chinese students go from their first year to later years,while the number of simple sentences shows a significant drop in year 4 and among better student writers,but is significantly higher than that of native speakers.There is a significant rise in the use of passives and reduced structures in the high-score group,but it is significantly lower than that of the native speakers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38