没有超越的“超越”——与陈波教授商榷  

A Critique on a Failed Critique

作　　者：王路[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学人文学院哲学系

出　　处：《哲学研究》2013年第3期69-79,128,共11页Philosophical Research

摘　　要：陈波教授在《哲学研究》撰文对弗雷格的“思想”提出严厉批评。（《超越弗雷格的“第三域”神话》，见《哲学研究》2012年第2期。以下简称“《超越》”，引文只注页码）他把弗雷格关于思想的论述概括为10个论题，认为它“是一个患了癌症的机体”（第70页），这使我想起30年前贝克和哈克对弗雷格的批评：弗雷格的哲学含混、不一致，自相矛盾无法弥补。It is true that Frege has a critical attitude towards psychologism,but his critique is never isolated on psychologism itself but always and mainly on the confusion of logic with it.Frege's talk about thought is always combined with truth,which always takes a central place in his theory and must not be neglected.One might disagree with and even attack on Frege's ideas and theories,but in doing so,one has to show convincing grounds,which above all should be based on a good understanding of Frege's works.

关 键 词：“超越” 陈波 《哲学研究》 弗雷格 “思想” 批评 含混 贝克 

分 类 号：B085[哲学宗教—哲学理论]