行政诉讼中的行政首长出庭应诉制度研究  

Study on the Chief Executives Appearing in Court System In the Administrative Litigation

作　　者：章志远[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《法学杂志》2013年第3期94-104,共11页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：2012年国家社会科学基金一般项目"行政法视野下的公私合作治理研究"(编号12BFX044);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2012年重大项目"城镇化进程中行政纠纷多元解决机制研究"(编号12JJD840014);苏州大学东吴公法与比较法研究所2012年度招标课题"江苏行政纠纷解决机制研究"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：检视行政首长出庭应诉制度的文本变迁和实践运作,可以发现原本处于边缘化地位的行政首长出庭应诉制度已经上升为当前行政审判的重要制度。行政首长出庭应诉制度的兴起既是人民法院努力优化行政审判外部环境和民众寻求行政争议实质性解决的结果,更与行政机关改善自身形象寻求外力合作治理的动向密不可分。行政首长出庭应诉制度的运作目前尚存在运动化、形式化和庸俗化的误区。为了保障行政首长出庭应诉制度的有效实施,应当坚持三步走的渐进式制度运行模式并辅之相配套的裁量机制、评价机制和公开机制。From the changes of texts and practice of the Chief Executives Appearing in Court System, it can be found that the former peripheral system has become one of the most important systems in the administrative litigation. The thriving of the Chief Executives Appearing in Court System is not only resulted by the courts＇ effort to optimizing the external environments of admin- istrative trials and the people＇s seeking to the substantial resolutions of the administrative dis-putes, but also closely related with the administrations＇ trend to improve their images by seeking for cooperative governance. The Chief Executives Appearing in Court System still has some prob-lems such as inconstancy, formalization and vulgarization. In order to ensure the Chief Executives Appearing in Court System will implement effectively, the ＂three-steps＂ gradual mode assisted with the Discretion Mechanism, the Evaluation Mechanism and the Open Mechanism should be persisted in.

关 键 词：行政诉讼 行政首长 出庭应诉 司法环境 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]