检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李锐[1,2] 苗丹民[1] 杨业兵[1] 武圣君[1] 关慕桢[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学心理学教研室(西安) [2]解放军65635部队卫生队
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2013年第3期364-366,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:国防部重大专项资助项目(GFB20081101)
摘 要:目的探讨应征青年不同检测环境下采用征兵心理检测系统的差异及影响因素,为制定入伍后心理检测标准提供数据支持。方法采用全国征兵心理检测软件,对384名被试进行不同检测环境下的性格测验,前次检测在武装部进行,后次检测在入伍后4w进行,对两次检测结果进行统计学分析。结果两次检测结果的机检阳性率均无明显差异;性格测验Net(44.37±8.80,46.04±7.06)、Set(44.46±8.05,47.04±8.69)因子后测显著高于前测(t=-3.58,-4.69;P<0.01)Dit(46.08±7.23,44.85±8.72,)、Ant(49.58±9.07,48.28±9.66)因子后测显著低于前测(t=2.52,2.06;P<0.05);环境与文化间不存在交互作用;高文化组在Net、Dit和Ant上存在显著差异(t=5.16,1.67,-2.63;P<0.05),低文化组在Set、Dit和Ant上存在显著差异(t=4.57,2.06,-4.12;P<0.05)。结论征兵心理检测系统具有良好稳定性;建议制定入伍后心理检测标准时要考虑环境和文化因素的影响。Objective To compare the differences of personality test by Chinese enrollment psychological test system under dif- ferent environment and influencing factors. ~lethods A total of 384 recruited youths were tested under different testing conditions by Chinese enrollment psychological test software. The first test was conducted in armed forces departments and the second was conducted after they entered the army for 4 weeks. The results were carried out for statistical analysis. Results There was no sig- nificant difference in the positive rate of two tests by system (x^2 = 1.19, P〈 0.275). The Net (44.37±8.80,46.04±7.06) and Set (44.46±8. 05,47.04±8. 69)factors tested in the second personality test were significantly higher than the former (t = 3. 58, -4.59;P〈0.01) ,whereas the Dit (46.08±7.23,44.85±8.72)and Ant(49.58±9.07,48.28±9.66)factors tested in the latter test were significantly lower than the former(t= 2.52,2.06;P〈0.05). There were no interactions between the environment and e- ducation level. Distinct differences in Net,Dit and Ant factors could be observed in the higher educated group (t = 5. 16, 1. 67, -2.63 ;P〈0. 05) ,while obvious differences in Set,Dit and Ant factors could be observed in the lower efiucated group(t = 4. 57, 2.06,-4.12;P〈0.05). Conclusion Chinese enrollment psychological test system has a good stability. New testing standards of personality test should be draw up based on different education levels and environments which will influence the result.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.172.251