检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁永君[1] 井小会[1] 刘玉刚[1] 郭运杰[1] 王粉[1]
机构地区:[1]平顶山市第一人民医院,河南平顶山467000
出 处:《中国肿瘤》2013年第3期232-234,共3页China Cancer
摘 要:[目的]比较FOLFIRI方案与FOLFOX4方案一线治疗晚期大肠癌的疗效和不良反应。[方法]将56例晚期大肠癌患者随机分为两组:FOLFIRI方案组(n=28)和FOLFOX4方案组(n=28),2个周期后观察疗效和不良反应。[结果]FOLFIRI组有效率(RR)为35.7%,中位肿瘤进展时间(TTP)为7.5个月,中位总生存期(mOS)为15个月,1、2、3年生存率分别为89.29%、73.08%和40.00%;FOLFOX4组RR为39.3%,TTP为7.5个月,mOS为16个月,1、2、3年生存率分别为89.29%、72.00%和45.45%;两组比较各项指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不良反应中FOLFIRI组腹泻发生率高于FOLFOX4组,神经毒性发生率明显低于FOLFOX4组。[结论]FOLFIRI方案与FOLFOX4方案的疗效相当,都可作为晚期大肠癌的一线标准方案。[Purpose ] To compare the efficacy and toxicity of FOLFIRI and FOLFOX4 regimens in the first- line treatment fbr advanced colorectal cancer. [Methods] Fifty-six patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly divided into two groups: FOLFIRI group(n=28) and FOLFOX4 group(n=28).The response and toxicity were evaluated after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. [Results] In FOLFIRI group the response rate(RR), median time to tumor progression (Tl'P),median overall survival (mOS) and 1-,2-,3- survival rates were 35.7% ,7.5 months, 15 months,89.29% ,73.08% and 40.00% ,respectively; while in FOLFOX4 group those were 39.3%, 7.5 months, 16 months, 89.29%,72.00% and 45.45% respectively.There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P〉0.05). The incidence rate of diarrhea in FOLFIRI group was higher than that in FOLFOX4 group; while the incidence of neurotoxicity was significantly lower than that in FOLFOX4 group. [Conclusion ] FOLFIRI and FOLFOX4 regimens have similar treatment response,which can be used as a fi^t-line regimen for advanced colorectal cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.43.53