检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]义乌市中心医院口腔科,322000 [2]泰山医学院附属医院口腔科
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2013年第2期283-285,共3页Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:把老年患者(60~73岁)需要进行根管治疗的62颗患牙共146个根管随机分为P组(31颗牙,74个根管)和H组(31颗牙,72个根管),P组用ProTaper机用镍钛锉冠根向逐步深入法预备根管,H组用手用不锈钢锉逐步后退法预备根管,根管治疗后1次性根管充填,观察2组在根管预备时间、根扩反应、预备根管后患牙充填效果的差异。术后随访P组根管预备和充填均优于H组(P<0.05);平均用时P组短于H组。146 root canals in 62 teeth for root canal therapy(RCT) in elderly patients(aged 60 -73 years) were randomly divided into P and H groups. ProTaper machine with nickel titanium file was used in P group (31 teeth, 74 root canals), and stainless steel file in H Group (31 teeth, 72 root canals). Root canal preparation time, root spread reaction, and canal filling effects were compared between 2 groups. The root canal preparation and filling in group P are better than in group H(P 〈 0.05 ). The time consumption of RCT in group P was shorter than in group H.
关 键 词:PROTAPER机用镍钛锉 冠根向逐步深入法 根管治疗
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15