检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卜祯[1]
出 处:《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2012年第6期103-105,共3页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
摘 要:本次刑事诉讼法修改在理论界和实务界均引起了轰动,透过修正案草案说明不难发现立法者所持有的"刑诉法应当在家庭关系维系方面发挥作用"的立法精神。然而,新刑事诉讼法第188条的内容并不能真正落实上述立法精神,该条所努力的方向是证人出庭作证制度,而非作为问题根源存在的强制作证义务。故只有引入作为强制作证义务例外之一的"亲属拒证权",才能够从实质上起到维系家庭关系的作用,进而实现此次修法目标。The modification of the Criminal Procedural Law have caused a sensation in both theoretical and practical circles,and the legislative spirit legislators held that CPL should play a role in family relationships can be found through the draft amendment.However,the regulations of article 188 of the new Criminal Procedural Law can not really implement the above-mentioned legislative spirit.It just makes efforts in the direction of the system of witness appearing in court rather than the system of witness obligations,which is the root of the problem.Therefore,only when we introduce t4he system of relatives' privilege,which is an exception to the system of witness obligations,can we be able to essentially play the role of maintaining family relationships,so as to realize the law amendment targets.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43