自然人性论与道德人性论的交锋——重论鲁迅与梁实秋关于卢梭的论争  

A Confrontation between Natural Humanity and Human Ethicality: Rethinking the Debates about Rousseau between Lu Xun and Liang Shih-chiu

作　　者：胡翠娥[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学外国语学院

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第2期49-57,共9页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(NKZXB10113)

摘　　要：对鲁迅和梁实秋的论战尤其是他们关于卢梭的论争,学界多从"人性论"与"阶级论"的对立加以解读。事实上,"阶级论"或者"革命学说"都是"自然人性论"在政治和经济学上的逻辑延伸,同时,梁实秋信奉的普遍人性论非常接近传统儒家道德人性论。因此,鲁、梁论战的激烈性和不可调和性在很大程度上体现出近代中国自然人性论与道德人性论的必然交锋。It has been studied about the debates between Lu Xun and Liang Shih - chiu, especially their debates about Rousseau, mostly from the opposing views of ＂Humanity＂ and ＂class theory＂. In fact, both are the logical extension of ＂Natural Humanity＂ view in politics and economics. The universal theory of human nature that Liang Shih - chiu believed in is very close to the traditional Confucian moral theory of human nature. Therefore, their intensive and irreconcilable controversy in large part reflects the inevitable clash between the natural humanity theory and the human ethicality theory during modern China period.

关 键 词：卢梭 自然人性论 道德人性论 阶级论 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]