检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南省长沙市中心医院超声科,湖南长沙410004 [2]湖南省长沙市中心医院放射科,湖南长沙410004
出 处:《中国当代医药》2013年第9期93-93,95,共2页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的比较研究彩超和CT对甲状腺癌的诊断效率。方法回顾性分析67例术后病理确诊甲状腺癌患者的彩超及CT表现,比较两种方法诊断的有效性。结果彩超诊断甲状腺癌的准确率为82.1%,而CT则为80.6%,两者基本一致。结论彩超与CT诊断甲状腺癌各有优势,联合检查可提高诊断准确性。Objective To comparatively study the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid cancer by color ultrasound and com- puted tomography (CT). Methods Data of 67 patients definitely diagnosed as thyroid cancer after surgery in pathology by color uhrasound and CT were retrospectively analyzed in order to compare the efficiency of the two diagnostic methods. Results The accuracy of thyroid cancer diagnosis by color ultrasound was 82.1%, while by CT, it was 80.6%. The resuh was ahnost the same. Conclusion Diagnosis of thyroid cancer by color ultrasound or CT has its own advan- tage, and the diagnostic accuracy can be improved on combination.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200