表征与建构:两种理念还是一种实践?——研究的方法论之争  

Representation and Construction : Two Ideas or One Practice?——The Dispute of Research Methodology

作　　者：刘翠霞[1,2] 林聚任[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学哲学与社会发展学院 [2]南通大学管理学院

出　　处：《科学与社会》2013年第1期63-74,共12页Science and Society

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"西方社会学中的建构主义思潮研究"(10BSH005)阶段性成果

摘　　要：表征危机与建构主义思潮的兴起拉开了研究的方法论之争的新序幕。表征与建构都为人类理解把握世界提供了重要的视角,但它们各自也都面临诸多困境和风险。知识既非对客观实在的准确再现,亦非完全社会建构的结果,而是研究实践的产物。只有将表征与建构两种理念纳入到一种知识生产实践过程中来理解,才能真正规避知识生产的内卷化难题。表征与建构遵循着"问题化—科学化—社会化—客观化"的实践逻辑推动着知识的阶跃式增长,这为实践取向的社会研究提供了一种可行的解释,也为表征与建构之争的终结开启了希望。The crisis of representation and rise of constructionism opened a new prologue of the dis- pute of research methodology. Representation and construction provide us important perspectives on the world. However, the two methodological perspectives of research have been confronted with many difficulties. Knowledge seems to be neither the representation of reality nor the mere result of social construction. It is the product of research practice. Only when we put representation and con- struction into one practice of knowledge production, problems of involution about knowledge pro duction would be resolved. Representation and construction follows the practice logic of ＂Problema- tize, scientification, socialization, Obiectification＂, promoting knowledge experiencing a step growth. This provides a possible approach to practice oriental social research, and brings hope for ending the dispute of representation and construction.

关 键 词：表征 建构 实践 社会研究 

分 类 号：C0[社会学]