以法律体系统一为视角再谈精神损害赔偿制度——由新《刑事诉讼法》第99条引发的思考  

Further Debate about the Compensation for Mental Injury from the Angle of View of Legal System Unification Principle ——Reflection Caused by the Ninety-ninth Article of the New Criminal Procedure Law

作　　者：周华[1] 

机构地区：[1]三明学院政治法律系,福建三明365004

出　　处：《宜春学院学报》2013年第1期19-22,86,共5页Journal of Yichun University

摘　　要：精神损害赔偿意指对公民因人身权受侵害而引发的精神损害进行赔偿,其内涵界定未区分侵害行为的性质。横向考察我国立法,民法领域日益完善了精神损害赔偿制度,行政法首度认可了国家侵权中的精神损害抚慰金,目前来看唯有刑事立法存在精神损害赔偿制度的缺位。2012年《刑事诉讼法》大修,但其对精神损害赔偿请求权仍予否定,这与我国立法大环境是不吻合的,违背了宪法所提出的法律体系相统一的原则。The compensation for mental injury refers to compensation for the mental injury that caused by citizens＇ s personal rights infringement, the definition does not distinguish the nature of the tort. Through the comparison among legislation of China, the civil legislation improved the compelsation system for mental injury gradually, and the administrative law recognized mental injury solatium in the act of national infringement firstly. Therefore, the vacancy of compensation for mental injury only exists in the criminal legislation. In 2012, the amendment of criminal procedure law remains silent to the claim right of compensation for mental injury. These phenomena are incompatible with the legislation environment of China, and violate the unification principle of legal system that the Constitution put forward.

关 键 词：侵权行为 法律体系统一 精神损害赔偿 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]