检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李遇春[1]
出 处:《南京师范大学文学院学报》2013年第1期106-112,共7页Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University
基 金:教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-10-0407)
摘 要:在20世纪40-70年代的中国革命文学话语秩序中,始终存在着一种文学"组织化"的历史趋势。从"延安文学"到"十七年文学",再到"文革文学",这种文学"组织化"趋势日益强大和严密,直至在"文革"中走到了历史的反面。革命文学话语秩序中的文学"组织化"本质上属于制度化权力的表现,其中隐含了中国革命文学的政治经济学,它主要通过行政和经济的手段对创作主体的生存方式、文学作品的生产、传播和接受诸领域进行组织化规约,并最终确立了新中国行政指令性的计划型文学生产体制。但在文学组织化的历史趋势中始终伴随着消解它的历史潜流。In the sequence of Chinese revolutionary literature discourse during 1940' to 1970s, there was a historical "organizational" tendency in literature. From "Yah' an literature", to the "literature in the 17 years", and to the "literature of Cultural Revolution" , this tendency had become stronger and more restric- ting, until went to the opposite of the history. This "organizational" tendency is actually a manifestation of in- stitutional power, implicating Chinese revolutionary political economy. It conducts organizational regulating on the existing way of the creators, the production, spreading and reception of the literature works by administra- tional and economical means, and eventually established the mandatory and planning production system of lit- erature in China. However, along with the "organizational" tendency, there is always an undercurrent of dis- sipating it through the history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222