机构地区:[1]重庆师范大学教育科学学院,重庆400047 [2]西南大学心理健康教育研究中心,重庆400715 [3]华中科技大学教育科学研究院,武汉430074
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2013年第3期224-231,共8页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:重庆市教育科学"十一五"规划课题(10-GJ-0518);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJCXLX045)
摘 要:目的:探索大学生情绪应对策略的构成,编制大学生情绪应对策略问卷(College Students'Emotion-based Coping Strategies Questionnaire)并检验其信度和效度。方法:在整合Folkman等的情绪关注应对和Stanton等的情绪方式应对基础上,提出情绪应对的概念,构建大学生情绪应对策略构成的理论成分,并据此编制问卷。从我国东部、中部和西部地区的高校中抽取全日制在校大学生3321名,将问卷按班级随机分为两部分,分别进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,使用多特质-多方法矩阵考察问卷的结构效度,使用简易应对量表(B-COPE)、情绪方式应对量表(EAC)、情绪表达性量表(EES)和Mar-low e-Crow ne社会期望量表简式版(M CSD-S)检验问卷的效标效度,并检验问卷的信度。结果:一阶探索性因素分析得到9个因子,项目的负荷值在0.41~0.80之间,二阶探索性因素分析得到4个因子,负荷值在0.58~0.85之间。验证性因素分析的各项拟合指数均达到心理测量学的要求(CMIN/DF<5,GFI、AGFI、NFI、TLI和CFI均>0.90,RM SEA=0.05,RM R<0.08)。问卷各因子分与效标量表中理论上有关的维度得分呈正相关(r=0.50~0.68,均P﹤0.01);除分散注意、接受事实、主动识别情绪和自我宣泄得分与MCSD-S得分的相关无统计学意义外(r=0.04~0.07,均P﹥0.05),其余因子与MCSD-S得分均呈较低相关(r=0.07~0.20,均P﹤0.05)。一阶因素的Cronbach系数在0.60~0.87之间,重测信度在0.67~0.83之间,二阶因素的Cronbach系数在0.71~0.84之间,重测信度在0.74~0.82之间。结论:大学生情绪应对策略是由4个二阶因素和9个一阶因素构成的多维度、多层次结构。本研究编制大学生情绪应对策略问卷的心理测量学指标良好,适宜用于测量我国大学生的情绪应对策略。Objective:To develop the College Students' Emotion-based Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSECS) and test its reliability and validity,so as to explore the components construct of the college students' emotion-based coping strategies. Methods: Based on the integration of the emotion-focused coping presented by Folkman and Lazarus and the emotional-approach coping presented by Stanton and colleagues,the concept of the emotion-based coping was put forward.Combining with the literature analysis and the result of the open-ended inventory survey and close-ended inventory survey,the theoretical components construct of the college students' emotion-based coping strategy types was obtained and then the questionnaire of the College Students' Emotion-based Coping Strategies was developed.The full-time students from the colleges or universities in the eastern,central and western regions of China were sampled out as respondents.The formal measurement data of the 3321 valid questionnaires was processed with exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis,and the multitrait-multimethod matrix was used to inspect the convergent validity and the discriminant validity.The Brief COPE Scales (B-COPE),Emotional Approach Coping Scales (EAC),Emotional Expressivity Scale (EES),and Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale-Short Version (MCSD-S) was applied to examine the criterion-related validity,and the reliability of the questionnaire was tested. Results: The first-order exploratory factor analysis extracted 9 factors,and the factor loadings of the items were 0.41~0.80.The second-order exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 factors,and the factor loadings were 0.58~0.85.The fitting indices of confirmatory factor analysis reached the requirements of psychometrics (CMIN/DF〈5,GFI,AGFI,NFI,TLI,and CFI〉0.90,RMSEA=0.05,RMR〈0.08).The factors of questionnaire and the theoretically related dimensions of the B-COPE,EAC,and EES had high positive correlation (r=0.50~0.68,P〈0.01�
关 键 词:情绪应对 策略 大学生 构成 问卷编制 心理测量学
分 类 号:B842.6[哲学宗教—基础心理学] B841.7[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...