检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南省肿瘤医院干疗科,650118
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2013年第2期155-157,178,共4页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的比较SP方案(替吉奥联合顺铂)与XELOX方案(奥沙利铂联合希罗达)治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及安全性。方法对32例晚期胃癌患者采用SP方案治疗,并与XELOX方案(30例)进行疗效比较。结果 SP方案组总有效率为50.0%(16/32),XELOX方案组总有效率为43.3%(13/30),两组间比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);SP方案组骨髓抑制发生率较XELOX组高,而手足综合征、神经毒性发生率较XELOX组低,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 SP方案和XELOX方案对晚期胃癌的疗效相近,毒副作用可耐受,临床中可根据患者年龄、一般状况及其他预后因素个体化选择化疗方案。Objective To compare the efficacy and toxicity of the regimen of SP (S-1 and cisplatin) with XELOX (ox- aliplatin and xeloda) in treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Data of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with SP( n = 32) were compared with those treated with XELOX( n = 30). Results The overall response rate was 50.0% in SP group and 43.3% in XELOX group (P 〉0.05). The main complications were myelosuppression in SP group and hand-foot syndrome ,neurosensory in XELOX group (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion SP regimen is as effective as XELOX in the treat- ment of advanced gastric cancer with tolerable toxicities. We should choose individual chemotherapy regimens by patient, stage, peformas status and other prognostic factors.
关 键 词:晚期胃癌 SP(替吉奥联合顺铂) XELOX(奥沙利铂联合希罗达)
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.131