汉化版情商问卷在大学生中应用的信效度评价  

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire

作　　者：赵海[1] 马迎华[1] 庄丽丽[1] 吕晓静[2] 吕晓辉[3] 田野[1] 宋娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学公共卫生学院 [2]北京市西城区疾病预防控制中心 [3]河北工业大学理学院

出　　处：《中国学校卫生》2013年第3期317-319,323,共4页Chinese Journal of School Health

摘　　要：目的评价汉化版情商问卷在大学生中使用的信度和效度,为情商研究提供有效的测量工具。方法采用汉化版情商问卷及Young网络成瘾量表,对选修北京某医科大学《生活技能教育与心理健康促进》课程和河北某理工科大学《健康与发展》课程的大学生共556名进行问卷调查。采用Cronbach'sα系数法、相关分析和因子分析评价量表的信度和结构效度,用Young网络成瘾诊断量表评价区分效度。结果汉化版情商问卷的Cronbach'sα系数为0.887。各条目与总量表得分间相关系数在0.19～0.72间(P值均<0.01)。探索性因子分析提取了9个因子(累计解释方差为50.78%),仅有个别题目的归属与情商问卷的假设不一致。量表除"快乐"外所有的维度和总分上,有无网瘾者的得分差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。结论中文版情商问卷有较好的信度和区分效度,但是仍然需要扩大样本在将来的研究中更深入地验证并改进其结构效度。Objective To study the reliability and validity of the Chinese version Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire（EIQ）,and to provide effective measurement for EQ research.Methods The Chinese version of EIQ and Scale for Internet addiction were finished by 443 undergraduate students from medical university and 113 students from a science and engineering university.The reliabilities and validities of the EIQ were examined by Pearson’s correlations and factor analysis.Results The Cronbach’s α was 0.887.Item total score correlations were between 0.19 and 0.72（P＆lt;0.01）.Exploratory factor analyses yielded nine factors（and the cumulative contribution rate of variance was 50.78%）.Only a few items were inconsistent with the hypothesis of EIQ.The scores of people addict to Internet were lower than the scores of people who did not.Except the ＂happy＂ dimension,the difference were significant.Conclusion The reliability and discriminate validity of EIQ are acceptable.However,more rigorous studies with larger samples are needed to further examine and improve the construct validity.

关 键 词：情感 问卷调查 统计学 学生 

分 类 号：R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学] B841.7[医药卫生—医学心理学]