硬通道引流和软通道引流治疗老年高血压脑出血临床疗效对比研究  

Clinical Comparative Study of Hard Passage Drainage and Soft Tube Drainage in the Treatment of Senile Hypertensive

作　　者：廖颂明 江焕新[1] 沈伟俊[1] 吴靖[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州市白云区人民医院神经外科,广东广州510600

出　　处：《临床医学工程》2013年第3期294-295,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering

摘　　要：目的观察硬通道引流和软通道引流治疗老年高血压脑出血的经过,并对比其临床疗效。方法选择符合入选标准的老年高血压患者82例,随机分为软通道组和硬通道组,将两组分别实施软通道和硬通道引流加以治疗。治疗后观察病死率、血肿清除量、临床疗效等指标。结果两组血肿清除量、临床疗效及ADL相比较,软通道组均优于硬通道组,而病死率作对比,硬通道组较低。结论软通引流治疗老年高血压脑出血的疗效在一定条件下优于硬通道引流。Objective To contrast the clinical efficacy of hard passage drainage and soft tube drainage in the treatment of senile hypertensive brain hemorrhage. Methods 82 cases of elderly patients with hypertension were randomly divided into two groups, with soft channel drainage and hard passage drainage treatment respectively. The fatality, hematoma volume, clinical efficacy index after treatment were observed. Results The clinical efficacy, hematoma volume and ADL in the soft channel group were better than hard channel group, while the fatality was lower in the hard channel group. Conclusions The soft drainage in the treatment of senile hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in certain conditions is better than hard passage drainage.

关 键 词：硬通道引流 软通道引流 脑出血 老年性高血压 

分 类 号：R743.34[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]