检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属第一医院口腔科,福州350005
出 处:《中国实用口腔科杂志》2013年第2期108-110,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:目的比较硅橡胶闭口式印模法和开口式印模法在无牙颌义齿修复中的临床疗效。方法收集2008年3月至2011年9月福建医科大学附属第一医院口腔科收治的无牙颌修复患者30例,按初诊时间顺序随机分为闭口式印模组和对照组,分别使用闭口式和开口式印模法制作全口义齿,3个月后复查其吸附力和压痛修改情况。结果用闭口式印模法制作的全口义齿,吸附力好于开口式印模法,其压痛修改次数也明显减少。结论对于无牙颌全口义齿的制作,硅橡胶闭口式印模法优于开口式印模法。Objective To compare the effect of two ways' impressions in edentulous jaws prosthodontics:jaw-closing impression and jaw-opening impression. Methods Thirty cases of complete denture patients were chosen, and random- ly divided into two groups;complete dentures were made by jaw-closing impression and jaw-opening impression respectively, then the adsorbability and sore spots modifications were checked after three months. Results The adsorbability of complete denture fabricated with jaw-closing impression technique was better and the times of sore spots amendment were less. Conclusion In fabrication of complete denture, jaw-closing impression technique with silicone rubber materials is better than jaw-opening impression technique.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145