检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱燕敏[1] 许国强[1] 陈洪潭[1] 滕晓东[1] 王丽君[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院消化科,杭州310003
出 处:《中华消化杂志》2013年第4期223-225,共3页Chinese Journal of Digestion
摘 要:目的应用图像分析软件对食管颗粒细胞瘤(GCT)的超声内镜图像进行分析研究,探索其诊断和鉴别诊断价值。方法经病理及免疫组织化学检查确诊的食管GCT和食管平滑肌瘤患者各8例,用图像分析软件测定病灶的超声内镜图像灰度平均值和灰度标准偏差,两组间比较行t检验。结果在内镜图像和超声内镜图像中,食管GCT和食管平滑肌瘤的表现相似。食管GCT和食管平滑肌瘤病灶的超声内镜图像灰度平均值均数分别为67.51和51.76,差异有统计学意义(t=2.225,P=0.043),但二者的超声内镜图像灰度标准偏差均数差异无统计学意义(13.54比13.12,t=0.225,P=0.825)。结论可通过比较食管GCT和食管平滑肌瘤超声内镜图像的灰度平均值来提高超声内镜诊断食管GCT的准确率。Objective To analyze endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) image of esophageal granular cell tumor (GCT) by computer image analysis software, and to explore its diagnostic and differential diagnostic value. Methods Eight esophageal GCT and eight leiomyomas confirmed by pathological and immunohistochemical examination were collected, mean gray value and gray value standard deviation of EUS image of the leisons were analyzed by computer image analysis software. The comparison of two groups was analyzed by t test. Results The endoscopic and ultrasound images of esophageal GCT and leiomyomas were similar. The mean gray value of EUS image of esophageal GCT and esophageal leiomyomas was 67.51 and 51.76, the difference was statistically significant (t= 2. 225,P= 0. 043). However, there was no significant difference in the standard deviation of gray value (13.54 vs 13.12, t=0. 225, P=0. 825). Conclusion The accuracy of GCT diagnosed by EUS could be increased by comparing the gray values of EUS images of esophageal GCT and leiomyomas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7