新《民事诉讼法》第170条评析  

Analysis of Article 170 of the New Civil Procedure Law

作　　者：许方钱[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学诉讼法研究中心

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2013年第1期45-51,共7页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

基　　金：2012年上海地方高校大文科学术新人培育计划资助项目成果之一;项目编号:HZ-S2012049

摘　　要：新《民事诉讼法》第170条对民事二审发回重审制度作了部分修改,该制度的相关问题也引起了学者们新的关注。立法修改,有值得肯定的地方,也有待商榷之处。通过认识该制度近十年的发回重审率、发回重审的原因、重审效果和异化使用状况,剖析立法修改的长处和不足,进而提出实践运用的相关策略。Article 170 of the new CivilProcedure Law has made some changes in the system of remand in civil cases of second instance. Issues related to the system have also attracted new attention from scholars. Legislative changes are worthy of affirmation in some ways. However, there are debatable points. With cognition of the remand rate in the recent ten years, causes for remand, remand results and the alienation effect, this article makes an analysis of strengths and weaknesses of the legislative changes and comes up with relevant strategies for practical application.

关 键 词：民事二审 发回重审 事实瑕疵 程序瑕疵 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]