检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王淑华[1]
出 处:《学术探索》2013年第5期73-76,共4页Academic Exploration
基 金:河南省软科学研究项目(122400420017)
摘 要:刑事诉讼中回避制度的设置有其重要的核心价值、理性价值和延伸价值,对于领导干部而言,由于其特殊的权力、影响力,适用回避制度的意义更加重要。但是回避在现行的刑事诉讼规定中存在一定的缺陷,尤其是对公安司法机关负责人的回避在法条规定和程序设置上有诸多瑕疵。通过对发现的这些缺陷进行深入的考量和分析,重点找寻出问题的症结,从五个方面提出完善的方案,希望使回避制度的架构更加严谨,为权力的廉洁规范化行使提供参考。The setting of challenge system in criminal proceedings has its core value, rational value and extension value, the application of which is of greater significance for leading cadres because of their special power influence. But the defects of the challenge system are found in the current criminal procedure rules, especially in the law stipulations and program settings on the challenge of persons in charge of public security and judicial organs. With a thorough analysis of these defects, this article focu- ses on the crux of the problem, and then puts forward proposals in five aspects. It is hoped that these suggestions help with a more rigorous challenge system and provide some reference to the honest and standardized exercise of power.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15