检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《国际眼科杂志》2013年第4期796-798,共3页International Eye Science
摘 要:目的:探讨氩绿激光治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞的临床疗效。方法:经眼底荧光血管造影(FFA)确诊为视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)患者60例60眼。患者随机分两组:A组(治疗组)使用氩绿视网膜光凝治疗30例;B例(对照组)口服活血化瘀药物(复方血栓通胶囊)治疗30例;两组患者随访时间为治疗后1,3,6,12mo,随访内容为视力、FFA检查及眼底情况,对治疗6mo后视力恢复结果和黄斑水肿消退情况进行对比。结果:A组:显效8例,有效20例,无效2例。B组:显效2例,有效14例,无效14例。A组合并黄斑囊样水肿者14例,给予氩绿视网膜光凝治疗后黄斑水肿消退12例,未消退2例;B组合并黄斑囊样水肿者13例,药物治疗后黄斑水肿消退3例,未消退10例,经卡方检验,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:氩绿激光对视网膜分支静脉阻塞的激光治疗有显著疗效,激光治疗组治疗后6mo病情稳定,效果好。AIM : To study the clinical curative effect argon chlorine laser treatment in branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO) . METHODS :The 60 BRVO patients clinically confirmed by fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (treatment group) 30 cases underwent argon chlorine laser photocoagulation ; group B (control group)30 cases were for activating blood circulation and eliminating stasis drugs (compound thrombosis the capsule) ). The results of visual acuity and macula edema regression in the two groups 6 months after treatment were compared. RESULTS: Group A: obviously effective in 8 cases, effective 20 cases. Group B: obviously effective in 2 cases, effective in 14 cases, invalid in 14 cases; Group A had 14 cases combined with macular edema, and after argon chlorine retinal photocoagulation, macular edema disappeared in 12 cases, not retreat in 2 cases; Group B had 13 cases combined with macular edema, and macular edema disappeared after medical treatment in 3 cases, not disappeared in 10 cases. CONCLUSION:The argon laser photocoagulation is an effective treatment for BRVO, promote the visual acuity, shorten the duration of symptoms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33