民事案件裁判方法论:三段论法与证明责任法  

Adjudicative Methods in Civil Case:Syllogism and Proof Responsibility

作　　者：程春华 

机构地区：[1]东莞市中级人民法院,广东东莞523008

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2013年第2期93-98,共6页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国法学会部级法学研究课题"民事诉讼证明对象研究"(2008D08054)

摘　　要：三段论法是法院裁判民事诉讼纷争时常用的方法。司法实践中证明责任法应是三段论法的补充,且应同为民事案件裁判思维方法。民事案件应根据案情的复杂和适用法律难易程度来考量运用何种方法裁判案件。事实清楚、案情简单、法律适用不复杂的案件,可运用三段论法作出裁判;相反,则宜采证明责任法的思维裁判案件。涉及请求权竞合或者当事人变更诉讼请求的案件,两者还可能交错运用;而事实真伪不明时,法官裁判案件只能采证明责任法。The syllogism is a common method to civil cases referee.In judicial practice,the burden of proof is the complement of the syllogism,both to constitute the way of thinking to civil cases referee.The adjudication method we should consider to adjudicate cases is appropriate according to complexity of case and difficulty of law application.A simple case,in which the fact is clear and the law application is easy,is consequently judged by the syllogism method and gets the adjudication result.When in a difficult case,it is advisable to take the responsibility proof thought to judge cases.When the case involves claim concurrence or the claim alteration by the parties,the two methods may be utilized at the same time.If in a case,when the truth or false of its facts is unclear,the only appropriate judge method is the responsibility proof means.

关 键 词：裁判方法 民事案件 三段论法 证明责任法 

分 类 号：D915.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]