柯尔律治自然观与中国“天人合一”生态思想的比较与思考  

Coleridge's View of Nature and China's Ecological Thought of "Nature-Human Integrity": Comparisons and Reflections

作　　者：鲁春芳[1] 郭峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江财经大学外国语学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《浙江师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第2期74-80,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学规划项目"柯尔律治自然观研究"(10YJA752020);浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目"柯尔律治自然观研究"(10CGWW05YB)

摘　　要：柯尔律治诗歌主题常常褒贬不一,其自然观的价值与意义几乎无人论及。柯尔律治诗歌创作体现了人与自然"和谐整一"的自然观,这一主张是一种对现代化工业发展后果的反思与批判,是20世纪后期生态危机语境下西方现代生态思潮的超前意识和智慧体现;中国"天人合一"生态理念主要集中在中国古代思想家的所思所想,是我国长期农业文明社会形态下的自然产物,是一种非反应型的生态伦理智慧。两者虽然在时间上、文化背景上、追思发问的问题意识上有所不同,但是,在构建生态道德,抵御贪婪欲望,寻求人与自然、人与人和谐整一等方面有着本质的联系。以生态批评为理论支点,反观、反思、比较以上不同文化资源中的核心价值准则,以期寻求一种适应现代人生活的生态哲学理念、崇高的精神价值和良好的生活方式。One of the important roots of Coleridge＇ s view of nature is the industrial revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries. ＂Harmony and unity＂ as its philosophical basis, Coleridge and far-reaching ecological wisdom, an immediate response to the onrushing an ＇ s view of nature is of great d unavoidable environmental and spiritual crisis of the industrialization. The idea of ＂Nature-Human Integrity＂ in China, rooted in the ancient Chinese minds, is the natural product of Chinese agricultural society, and therefore it is not an ecolog- ical ethic in direct response to particular ecological events. While they differ in time, cultural context and problem consciousness, the two do share some common ground in the advocacy of establishing ecological mor- al, resisting man＇s material desires, pursuing unity and harmony between man and nature and within human being. The reconsideration and discussion of these two values aims to seek a new modem ecological philosophy of life, a higher ideal of spirit and a higher order of existence

关 键 词：柯尔律治 整一和谐 天人合一 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]