检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐含笑[1]
机构地区:[1]福建师范大学福清分校人文科学系,福建福清350300
出 处:《安康学院学报》2013年第2期61-64,共4页Journal of Ankang University
摘 要:目的采用DRM范式探讨不同关联方式和学习程度对错误记忆的影响。方法实验以中文字词为材料,将词语和相应词表的关键项目之间的关联方式分为语义关联、语音关联、字形关联三种,对三种不同关联的材料进行三次或者一次学习并统计各关联方式词语在不同程度学习中的错误再认率。结果 (1)三种关联方式对错误记忆的影响都很显著,其中字形关联的错误记忆效应明显大于语义关联、语音关联;(2)学习程度的提高能降低对关键项目的错误再认率;(3)在两种不同学习程度下的各种关联方式的错误再认率之间不存在明显差异。结论学习程度和关联方式都能明显的引发错误记忆。Objective: DRM paradigm to explore different related ways and learn the extent of the impact of false memories. Methods: Ex- periment to the terms of the Chinese material into semantic association, the association between the key words and vocabulary items, voice associated glyph associated with three, three times for three different materials associated or a learning and statistics of each way as- sociated words in different degrees of/earning the error recognition rate. Results: (1) the three associated false memor/es are very sig- nificant glyphs associated error memory effect was significantly greater than the semantics associated voice associated; (2) learning to reduce the rate of false recognition of critical items; (3) there is no significant difference between the error rate of recognition of two different degree of learning under a variety of related ways. Conclusion: the extent and learning, associated cause false memories.
分 类 号:B842.3[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145