应用意愿价值评估法评价河流生态恢复的时间稳定性——以上海城市内河为例  

Temporal stability of river ecological restoration based on the assessment of Contingent Valuation Method: A case study of Shanghai urban river

作　　者：张翼飞[1] 王丹[2] 

机构地区：[1]上海对外贸易学院国际经贸学院,上海201620 [2]上海师范大学地理科学系,上海200234

出　　处：《应用生态学报》2013年第4期927-934,共8页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(40901291);上海市教委科研创新项目(13YZ053);上海师范大学理科基金项目(SK200844)资助

摘　　要：意愿价值评估法(CVM)的评估结果是否具有时间稳定性是其可靠性检验中的重要问题,决定其能否应用于我国的生态系统服务价值评估.本文以上海城市内河生态恢复为评估对象,设计相隔1个月和2年的3次意愿价值评估方案,分别对3次调查的426、498和200份问卷进行了对比分析.结果表明:3次支付意愿均值分别为14.2、14.1和18.0元,中位数分别为5、5和10元.进一步对支付意愿分布和主要统计值、影响因素、模型时间变量的显著性分析结果表明,相隔1个月的CVM结果具有时间上的稳定性,而相隔2年的CVM结果表现出一定差异.Whether the assessment results of Contingent Valuation Method （CVM） have temporal stability is an important issue in examining the reliability of CVM findings, and also, is critical to decide whether CVM can be applied to evaluate the ecosystem services value in China. Taking the ecological restoration along the Caohejing River in Shanghai as a case, three CVM survey schemes with one month apart and two years apart were designed. Then, 426,498, and 200 questionnaires in these surveys were comparatively analyzed, respectively. The mean values of the willingness to pay （WTP） from the three surveys were 14.2, 14.1, and 18.0 RMB, and the median values were 5, 5, and 10 RMB, respectively. With the comparison of the WTP distribution and the main statis- tics, the analysis of the factors affecting the WTP, and the test of the significances of temporal vari- ables, it was found that the CVM results from the surveys with one month apart had temporal stabili- ty, while those from the surveys with two years apart presented definite difference.

关 键 词：意愿价值评估法 时间稳定性 时间间隔 支付意愿 城市内河 

分 类 号：X2[环境科学与工程—环境科学]