检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张栎文[1] 王力[1] 张明亮[1] 陈安涛[1]
机构地区:[1]认知与人格教育部重点实验室,西南大学心理学院,重庆400715
出 处:《心理学探新》2013年第2期141-145,共5页Psychological Exploration
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(31170980)
摘 要:该研究采用经典Stroop色-词干扰任务,以在校大学生为对象来研究非彩色的Stroop效应。结果发现:(1)实验一,黑色和彩色都产生了典型的Stroop效应,且其干扰量无显著差异;(2)实验二,在排除颜色分类启动后发现,"黑"字条件会干扰颜色命名任务,但是"白"字条件则和中性条件的干扰量无显著差异。这意味着,Stroop冲突的产生可能不是来自于通道间而是基于类别的。In the present study, with college students as participants, the classical Stroop color - word task was adopted to investigate the Stroop effect of monocolors. Results were going as follows: ( 1 ) In Experiment 1, the Stroop effect was found both on black and other colors ( red, green and blue) and their interference did not differ significantly ; ( 2 ) In Experiment 2, that black could induce the Stroop effect was replicated, while the interference in WHITE condition and NEUTRAL condition had no significant difference. These results may im- ply that Stroop effect was based on category rather than pathways.
分 类 号:B842.5[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.84