检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河南预防医学杂志》2013年第2期90-91,95,共3页Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的了解身体质量指数法、皮褶厚度测量法和体成分仪判断人体肥胖的准确程度。方法将312名大学生分别测量体质指数、皮褶厚度,并计算肥胖程度,把计算结果和体成分仪判断结果相比较,从而了解身体质量指数法和皮褶厚度测量法对身体肥胖程度判断的准确程度。结果 3种方法对普通人群肥胖程度的判断基本一致,但均有部分差异。结论和体成分仪相比,体质指数法不如皮褶厚度法准确,适用范围较小。Objective To understand the accuracy on judged human obesity by the three methods of the body mass index method, skinfold measuring method and body composition. Methods To calculate the 312 college students' fat content by the three methods and compare. And to learn the accuracy of measurement of the body mass index methods and skinfold measuring methods. Result The three methods have a coincident judgement on the obesity in the general population., but there are some differences between each other. Conclusion Body mass index method is more simple than skinfold methods. But the skinfold method is more accurate.
分 类 号:R151.42[医药卫生—营养与食品卫生学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229