2009-2012年珠海市医院空气消毒效果监测分析  

Surveillance and Analysis on Air Disinfection Effect of Hospitals in Zhuhai from 2009 to 2012

作　　者：王松[1] 阮峰[1] 罗蕾蕾[1] 陈瑞莉[1] 郭继耀 

机构地区：[1]广东省珠海市疾病预防控制中心,广东珠海519002

出　　处：《实用预防医学》2013年第4期449-451,共3页Practical Preventive Medicine

摘　　要：目的分析珠海市医院空气消毒监测数据,发现存在的问题,提出改进措施。方法利用2009-2012年珠海市医院空气消毒效果监测资料,计算并比较珠海市不同级别医院以及不同环境类型的空气合格率。结果珠海市三级、二级、一级医院空气合格率分别是48.18%、74.19%、83.59%,三级和一二级医院差异有统计学意义(χ2=37.108,P<0.05);Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类环境空气合格率分别是37.37%、82.22%、64.71%,Ⅰ类和ⅡⅢ类环境空气差异有统计学意义(χ2=55.316,P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,三级医院Ⅰ类环境和Ⅱ类环境空气合格率明显低于一二级医院。结论珠海市三级医院空气合格率低可能与消毒管理等因素有关,建议医院要加强空气消毒管理力度。Objective To analyze the surveillance data of air disinfection of hospitals in Zhuhai, to find out the factors influencing disinfection efficacy, and to put forward the improving measures. Methods Surveillance data of air disinfection of hospitals in Zhuhai from 2009 to 2012 were collected, and the qualified rates of air of hospitals with different grades and different environment types were calculated and compared. Results The qualified rates of air of first - class, second - class and third - class hospitals were 48.18 %, 74.19 %, and 83.59 %, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between third - class hospitals and firstclass, second - class hospitals （X^2 = 37. 108, P 〈 0.05 ）. The qualified rates of air of environment types Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ were 37.37%, 82.22%, and 64.71%, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between environment type I and environment types II, III （X^2 = 55. 316, P 〈 0.05）. Conclusions The low qualified rate of air of thirdclass hospitals in Zhuhai City may be correlated with loose disinfection management. The results suggest that supervision on air disinfection in third - class hospitals should be strengthened.

关 键 词：医院 消毒 空气 

分 类 号：R187[医药卫生—流行病学]