检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈一博[1,2]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学管理学院博士后流动站 [2]中国华融资产管理股份有限公司博士后工作站,上海200237
出 处:《科技与经济》2013年第2期61-65,共5页Science & Technology and Economy
摘 要:通过对机械、医药、电子及信息设备、汽车、信息服务5个行业的192家上市公司2006—2011年研发投入强度与销售净利率、净资产收益率之间的相关关系进行实证检验,从技术研发投入的角度揭示了上市公司财务绩效的差异。得出研究样本中的5个行业研发投入强度与销售净利率、净资产收益率之间均存在显著的正相关关系;研发投入对企业财务绩效的提升有一定的滞后期,研发投入对当年财务绩效的提升不存在显著影响,但对未来1~2年企业财务绩效的提升有显著的正向影响;各个行业研发投入强度与财务绩效指标之间的相关系数差别较大,上述5个行业滞后一期的研发投入强度与销售净利率之间的相关系数分别为0.49、1.86、0.67、1.11、0.47。In this paper, we conducted an empirical test on the relationship among R&D input intensity and net profit margin and net assets income rate of 192 listed companies of machinery industry, pharmaceuticals industry, electronics and information equipment industry, automotive industry, information services industry from 2006 to 2011 to reveal the differences in listed companies' financial performance from the perspective of technical R&D input. We drew the conclusion that, there is a significant positive correlation among R&D input intensity of the 5 industries in the research sample, net-profit-margin, and net assets income rate. The enhancement of R&D input on the financial performance of enterprise is subject to a lag phase. There is no significant correlation between R&D input and the financial performance of the current year. But there is a significant positive affect on enhancement of enterprises' financial per- formance in the following 1 -2 years. The correlation coefficient between R&D input intensity and financial performance indicators was significantly different. These five industries' correlation coefficient between R&D input intensity with one lag phase and net-profit-mar- gin were 0.49, 1.86, 0.67, 1.11, and 0.47 respectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.64