检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭东晓[1] 林永强[1] 刘金花[2] 林林[1] 汪冰[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省食品药品检验所,山东济南250101 [2]济宁市药品检验所,山东济宁272025
出 处:《药学研究》2013年第4期208-210,共3页Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
摘 要:目的比较不同企业的复方黄连素片在4种溶出介质中的溶出曲线,为该制剂的质量评价提供参考。方法分别在水、0.1 mol.L-1盐酸、pH 5.9和pH 7.4磷酸盐缓冲液中,测定15个厂家复方黄连素片的溶出曲线,并用f2因子法分析结果。结果在水中有4个厂家的样品与参比制剂溶出过程一致,在0.1 mol.L-1盐酸中有3个厂家与参比制剂一致,在pH 5.9和pH 7.4缓冲液中分别仅有1个厂家与参比制剂一致。结论多数厂家与参比制剂的溶出曲线有显著差异,建议对溶出度进行规定以提高该药品质量。Objective To research the dissolution profiles of Compound Huangliansu Tablets from 15 manufacturers in 4 dissolution media and provide references for the quality evaluation of the above - mentioned drug. Methods The dissolution profiles were determined in water,0.1 mol·L^-1 HC1, pH 5.9 and pH 7.4 phosphate buffer solution. Then, the results were analyzed by the method off2 factor. Results In water, the dissolution profiles of 4 manufacturers were similar to that of the reference preparation (f2 ≥ 50 ). In 0.1 mol·L^-1 HC1,3 manufacturers were similar to the reference preparation. However, in pH 5.9 and pH 7.4 phosphate buffer solution, only one manufacturer was similar to the reference preparation, respectively. Conclusion The dissolution profiles of most of the manufacturers were significantly different from that of the reference preparation, which suggested that dissolution of the drug should be prescribed for the quality control.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.184