机构地区:[1]暨南大学第一临床医学院,广州510630 [2]暨南大学医学院第四附属医院广州市红十字会医院烧伤整形科 [3]暨南大学医学院第四附属医院广州市红十字会医院烧伤整形科创伤外科研究所 [4]广东省工伤康复中心烧伤整形科 [5]广东省人民医院烧伤外科
出 处:《中华烧伤杂志》2013年第2期195-200,共6页Chinese Journal of Burns
摘 要:目的 探讨重度烧伤患者教育程度、烧伤面积及应对行为对其并发心理障碍的影响。方法 采取整群随机抽样法,选取暨南大学医学院第四附属医院(广州市红十字会医院)、广东省工伤康复中心及广东省人民医院收治的64例重度烧伤患者,统计其人口学、烧伤情况等资料,并采用医学应对问卷、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)检查量表平民版(PCL-C)调查患者疾病应对方式和并发焦虑、抑郁、PTSD及其3个核心症状闪回、逃避、过度警觉的情况。对人口学资料、烧伤情况及应对行为与患者并发心理障碍情况进行相关分析,对教育程度、烧伤面积及应对行为与患者并发心理障碍情况进行预测分析。对数据行t检验;将定性自变量赋值,行Spearman等级相关分析、多元线性回归分析。 结果 (1)64例重度烧伤患者面对应对得分为(19.0±3.4)分,与国内常模的(19.5±3.8)分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-1.13,P〉0.05);回避、屈服应对得分分别为(16.6±2.4)、(11.0±2.2)分,显著高于国内常模的(14.4±3.0)、(8.8±3.2)分(t值分别为7.06、7.76,P值均小于0.01)。患者SAS、SDS、PCL-C标准分依次为(50±11)、(54±11)、(38±12)分,有89.1%(57/64)、60.9%(39/64)、46.9%(30/64)的患者存在焦虑、抑郁、PTSD症状。(2)本组患者年龄、性别、婚姻状况、伤后时间等4个自变量与其并发心理障碍有相关性,但无统计学意义(rs 值为-0.089~0.245,P值均大于0.05)。教育程度与焦虑、抑郁、PTSD、闪回、逃避均呈显著负相关(rs 值为-0.361^-0.253,P值均小于0.05);与过度警觉呈负相关,但无统计学意义(rs=-0.187,P〉0.05)。烧伤面积与患者并发心理障碍均呈显著正相关(rs 值为0.306~0.478,P值均小于0.05)。面对应对行为与患者并发心�Objective To discuss how the educational status, burn area and coping behaviors influence the psychological disorders in severely burned patients. Methods Sixty-four severely burned patients hospitalized in Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Center, and Guangdong General Hospital were enrolled with cluster random sampling method. Data of their demography and situation of burns were collected. Then their coping behavior, psychological disorders including anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) plus its core symptoms of flashback, avoidance, and hypervigilance were assessed by medical coping modes questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), PTSD checklistcivilian version (PCL-C) respectively. Correlation was analyzed between demography, burn area, coping behavior and psychological disorders. The predictive powers of educational status, burn area and coping behaviors on the psychological disorders were analyzed. The qualitative variables were assigned values. Data were processed with t test, Spearman rank correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis. Results (1) The patients scored (19.0±3.4) points in confrontation coping behavior, which showed no statistically significant difference from the domestic norm score (19.5±3.8) points (t=-1.13,P〉0.05). The patients scored (16.6±2.4) and (11.0±2.2) points in avoidance and resignation coping behaviors, which were significantly higher than the domestic norm score (14.4±3.0), (8.8±3.2) points (with t values respectively 7.06 and 7.76, P values both below 0.01). The patients′ standard score of SAS, SDS, PCL-C were (50±11), (54±11), and (38±12) points. Respectively 89.1% (57/64), 60.9% (39/64), 46.9% (30/64) of the patients showed anxiety, depression, and PTSD symptoms. (2) Four independent variables: age, gender, marital status, and time after burns, were
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...