中药炮制学课程形成性成绩的评价方式初探  被引量:7

Evaluation methods of formative scores in course of Chinese medicinal processing

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:修彦凤[1] 张永太[1] 冯年平[1] 

机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学中药学院,上海201203

出  处:《中医教育》2013年第2期26-28,共3页Education of Chinese Medicine

基  金:上海中医药大学第十一期课程建设项目(No.SHUTCMKCJS2011095)

摘  要:目的对仅以考试成绩作为评价大学生学习效果的传统方法进行改革,探索有利于提高学生综合能力的评价方式。方法以中药学专业学生为例,设定中药炮制学课程成绩由形成性成绩与终结性成绩2部分组成,形成性成绩由课堂提问、课堂讲授和课件评价等多个指标组成,采用调查问卷和比较终结性成绩的方式进行实施效果的评估。结果87.8%的学生认为应该将形成性成绩作为评价学习效果的指标,具体评价指标按照学生所选比例由高到低依次为课堂测验、课堂讲授、课堂提问、课件评价、自评和组间互评;86.2%的学生认为该评价方式有助于教师及时了解学生学习情况、督促学生自我学习,提高学生归纳、总结和分析、解决问题的能力;终结性成绩平均分较去年提高了3.8分。结论形成性成绩评价指标拟定为课堂提问(占10%)、课堂讲授(占30%)、课件评价(占20%)、课堂测验(占30%)、自评和组间互评(占10%)。Objective To reform the traditional methods of evaluating students' learning results, and investigate a evaluation method for improving students' comprehensive abilities. Methods Taken the students in the specialty of Chinese pharmacy for example, the scores of course of Chinese medicinal processing were divided into two parts including formative scores and final scores. The formative scores consisted of classroom questioning, lectures and courseware assessing. The implementation results were reviewed by using questionnaire and comparison in final score. Results Of hll students, 87.8% thought that the formative scores should be taken as the index for evaluating learning results, and the specific indexes, in a descent order, included classroom tests, lectures, classroom questioning, courseware assessing, self-evaluation and mutual evaluation among groups. Of all students, 86.2% thought that this method could help teachers to get know learning situation of students, supervise them to learn by themselves and improve their abilities of summing up, analyzing and solving questions. The average final score was increased by 3.8 scores than those in last year. Conclusion The evaluation indexes of formative scores are proposed for classroom questioning (10%), lectures (30%), courseware assessing (20%), classroom tests (30%) and self-evaluation and mutual evaluation among groups (10%).

关 键 词:中药炮制学 形成性成绩 教学改革 评价方式 

分 类 号:G642.41[文化科学—高等教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象