检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏南京210016 [2]南京审计学院信息科学学院,江苏南京210029
出 处:《工业工程》2013年第2期80-86,共7页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70901043);江苏省社科基金资助项目(12XSB014)
摘 要:基于2个开展R&D活动的供应商和2个竞争制造商组成的链与链竞争模型,研究了技术溢出条件下供应链企业R&D投资策略与协同机制。研究结果表明,纵向R&D合作投资是供应链系统博弈的占优策略,此时供应链系统收益、R&D投资水平均高于不合作情况,并且适度的技术溢出有利于提高供应链企业创新热情。但对于供应链成员企业而言,在自利动机驱使下,仅在一个有限的R&D成本分担比例区间内做出的决策与供应链系统一致,只有在该区间对成员企业的利益进行协调才能实现R&D合作的协同性。为此设计了基于合作满意度的R&D成本分担机制,通过建立不对称NASH谈判模型较好地协调了合作双方的利益,促进了供应链R&D协同效应的实现。Technological innovation is an important way for a supply chain firm to gain competitive advan- tage. By using game theory, a model is presented for chain to chain competition with two suppliers engaged in R&D and two competing manufacturers. With this model, the competition equilibrium, R&D strategy and synergistic conditions of supply chains with technological spillovers are analyzed. Results show that vertical R&D cooperation is the dominant strategy of supply chains to bring higher equilibrium profit and R&D input level than those of firms without cooperation activities. It also shows that appropriate technolog- ical spillover can improve innovation enthusiasm of suppliers. However, suppliers and manufacturers select R&D cooperation only in a finite R&D cost allocation range due to their self - serving motives. The R&D cost should be allocated in the interval such that the stability and synergy effect of R&D cooperation can be reached. Thus, cost allocation mechanisms are designed based on cooperation satisfaction to realize the synergy effect of vertical R&D cooperation, with which the benefits of both partners can be better coordina- ted by NASH negotiation model.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.209