汉英夸张隐喻构念的双象限认知理据验视  

An Observation of Double-paradigm Cognitive Motivation on Chinese-English Hyperbole Metaphor Construct

作　　者：孙毅[1] 江雪琴[2] 

机构地区：[1]西安外国语大学学报编辑部,陕西西安710061 [2]西安外国语大学英文学院,陕西西安710128

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第3期73-79,共7页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社科基金项目"基于ERP实验的隐喻认知神经机理研究"(11YJC740094);陕西省社科基金项目"认知隐喻学多维跨域研究"(12K143)

摘　　要：莱考夫和约翰逊在《我们赖以生存的隐喻》中鲜明地指出,隐喻无处不在、无时不有,隐喻不仅是辞格或曰简单的交际附属品,也是一种由语言承载并凸显的思维方式。文章在将充分的理论考察与足额的例证阐析有机结合的前提下提出:传统的夸张修辞不仅是表层的语词超常组配,更是以一事物描写另一相关事物的认知路径,换言之,夸张的本质是隐喻性的。汉英语言使用者共同的身体结构及其体验范式决定了两种夸张隐喻的趋同性;而中西方民族的文化模型又衍生出跨语言夸张隐喻的差异性。Co - authored by Lakoff and Johnson, the seminal book Metaphors We Live By takes a clear - cut stand that metaphor, existing everywhere and everywhen, is never merely a type of traditional rhetoric, or simply a commu- nicative by - product,but a mode of thinking represented and highlighted through language. It has been postulated, on the basis of integrally combining profound theoretical elaboration with adequate instance explorations, that hyper- bole is not only the unconventional collocation of words at the surface level but also the cognitive path to describing one concept in terms of another. In other words, hyperbole acquires all the cognitive essences of metaphor. Universal body structures and their ensuing experience patterns shared by the oriental and the west decide the metaphorical u- nification, while distinctive cultural models of the two motivate the discrepancies.

关 键 词：夸张隐喻 理据 经验主义现实论 文化模型 

分 类 号：H05[语言文字—语言学] B842.1[哲学宗教—基础心理学]