释“熔铸”——兼说比较研究的高端冲刺  

Fusion-Casting Explained——A Discussion of the Depths of Comparative Studies

作　　者：栾栋[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学外国文学文化中心,广州510420

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2013年第2期129-133,159,共5页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：广东省高教重大课题"中日哀感文学比较研究"(项目批准号:11ZGXM750010)攻关内容;广东省学位与研究生教育改革研究项目"人文类研究生改造知识结构问题求索"(项目批准号:11JGXM-MS24)阶段性成果;省级文科基地(广东外语外贸大学外国文学文化研究中心)项目"美学变革的前沿问题研究"首批成果

摘　　要："熔铸"一词是冶金学用语,同时也是人文类的治学方法。本文以熔铸研究为圭臬,检索了比较研究由来已久的弊端和学科命名的局限。比较研究的浅显性、牵强性和附会性,急需拓展熔铸性研究,以突破比较学科和比较方法的实证性滞留和类比性制约。在全球化的大趋势中,比较研究学科仍然会发挥一定的作用,但也有待克服其与生俱来的弊端和既泛且滥的问题。倡导熔铸研究不是要取消比较研究,而是要促成后者的高端冲刺,以期出现一个突破性的飞跃和创新性的升华。Borrowed from metallurgy,the concept of fusion-casting is a method in the study of the humanities.In the light of fusion-casting,the present thesis reviews the long-standing weaknesses of comparative studies and the limitations of its naming.Because of the superficiality and far-fetchedness in comparative studies,fusion-casting studies are imperative remedies so as to break the bondage of empiricism and analogies.In the general trend of globalisation,comparative studies will continue to play a role but the inherent weakness,excessive use and the low quality of such studies must be overcome.The case for fusion-casting studies is not intended to get rid of comparative studies.Rather,it is intended to increase the depth of the latter so that there shall be ground-breaking progresses and innovations.

关 键 词：比较方法 熔铸研究 思想深度 高端冲刺 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]