论过当犯的罪过形式  

On the Culpability Fault of Excessive Crime

作　　者：温建辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]聊城大学法学院,山东聊城252059

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第2期111-117,共7页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(J11WB52):<罪过理论转型研究>;山东省教育科学规划课题(2011GG056):<审美素质在法学教育中作用研究>

摘　　要：我国刑法规定的过当犯包括防卫过当和避险过当两种形式。过当犯在客观上超过了必要限度,在主观上却认为自己没有超过必要限度,这是一种事实上的认识错误。过当犯对过当结果持疏忽大意的过失,因此疏忽大意,防卫过当行为人才把明显超过必要限度的行为当作必要的行为,以至于发生了重大损害;避险过当行为人也才把较大的利益当作较小的利益而做出牺牲,以至于造成了不应有的损害。The provisions of the criminal law include excessive defense and excessive necessity. Excessive crimes made a mistake. The doer objectively more than the necessary limit, subjectively but believe they have no more than necessary to limit. The excessive doer holds negligence attitude. And thus, the doer thinks excessive defense behavior obviously exceeds as the limits of necessity that had a great damage. And excessive necessity doer make sacrifices a greater benefit as a smaller interest to a greater damage.

关 键 词：防卫过当 避险过当 认识错误 疏忽大意 情感态度 

分 类 号：DF637[政治法律—刑法学]