“婚姻法解释三”房产权属条款的法社会学思考  

The Legal-sociological Thinking about the Clause Concerning the Allocation of Housing Property Rights in the Third Interpretation of Marriage Law

作　　者：姚俊廷[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西师范大学政法学院,临汾041004

出　　处：《山西高等学校社会科学学报》2013年第4期67-70,共4页Social Sciences Journal of Universities in Shanxi

摘　　要："婚姻法解释三"第七条、第十条无意于侵害婚姻的伦理本质,推进或构建所谓的"契约"式婚姻;也不是漠视目前中国"从夫居"的婚姻现实,忽略性别间事实上的不平等。法律只是行为的底线。婚姻法是私法,人们完全可以通过协议更好地安排自己的生活。"婚姻法解释三"对房产权属的配置所直面和要解决的主要问题,毋宁是如何在离婚率增加、房价畸高、判决标准不一的情形下,为离婚时的房产权属争议提供公正、统一的司法判准。In the Marriage Law of PRC（Ⅲ）,the 7th and the 10th clauses show no intention of infringing the ethic nature of marriage or intaking＂AA system＂marriage,nor do they give little attention,on purpose,to the current actuality of ＂virilocal residence＂ and ignore the actual inequality between male and female.Law,generally speaking,is the bottom line of people′s behaviour.With regard to the private attribute of marriage law,people have the right to better arrange for their own life.As a result,the purpose of this interpretation is mainly to provide a just and uniform judicial standard to resolve the divorce-related disputes over the allocation of housing property right,especially when divorce rate is on the rise,house price is irrationally soaring,and the judicial decisions lack unified criterion.

关 键 词：婚姻法解释三 房产权属 法社会学 

分 类 号：D923.9[政治法律—民商法学]