检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京军区南京总医院耳鼻咽喉科,南京210002
出 处:《医学研究生学报》2013年第4期392-394,共3页Journal of Medical Postgraduates
摘 要:目的护理技能考核方法单一,国内外尚无较好的护理技能考核方法。研究合作性学习在网络化护理技能考核中的应用效果,探讨更加合理的护理技能考核办法。方法在文献分析、专家咨询的基础上,对648名参加护理技能考核的护士分别采用普通网络化护理技能考核和合作性学习网络化护理考核,考核结束调查合作性网络化考试与普通网络化考试的优缺点,并对调查结果进行分析。结果合作性网络化考试形式更受欢迎,相比于普通网络化考试可减轻考试压力,体现团队合作,提高掌握知识点的广度和深度,但不能完全体现个体水平。结论合作性学习在网络化护理技能考核中的应用可显著提高临床护理人员的团队协作能力,节约考核成本,值得推广应用。Objective The methods for assessing nursing skills lack variety as well as practicability both at home and abroad. This study aims to evaluate the application of cooperative learning in network assessment of nursing skills and find more rational methods for assessing nursing skills. Methods We reviewed relevant literature, consulted nursing specialists, and conducted exami- nations of nursing skills among 648 participants using the conventional network method and cooperative network method, respectively. We analyzed the assessment results and compared the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Results Cooperative net- work examination was significantly better received than conventional one (P 〈 0.01 ). It reduced the psychological pressure of the par- ticipants, inspired team cooperation and increased the extent and depth of knowledge, but could not completely reflect an individual's competence. Conclusion Cooperative learning deserves popularization in the network assessment of nursing skills, which can signif- icantly improve team cooperation among clinical nurses and reduce the cost of assessment.
分 类 号:R192.6[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249