检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东北大学信息科学与工程学院,沈阳110819
出 处:《高校辅导员学刊》2013年第2期36-39,共4页Journal of College Advisor
摘 要:目前,多数高校辅导员考核过于主观和模糊。虽然辅导员工作的内容并非都能够量化,但实践表明,能够量化的内容应该量化。量化考核应兼顾必要性和可操作性,所占比重不宜过大,且应坚持激励与"底线"相结合,定性定量相结合,要逐步完善定性定量考核办法,充分发挥考核在辅导员队伍建设中的积极作用。Currently, a majority of colleges and universities are excessively subjective and out of focus in evaluating their advisors. Though an advisor's job cannot all be quantified, efforts should be made to quantify whatever is quantifiable. Quantitative evaluation must give consideration to both its necessity and its operability. It should not make up too big a proportion in an advisor's performance assessment. Incentive must be combined with baseline, and qualitative with quantitative. Improved evaluation of college advisors can play a positive role in the team construction.
分 类 号:G641[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195