文本实践与文学理论知识形态的重构  

Reconstructing Textual Practice and Knowledge Morphology of Literary Theory

作　　者：胡友峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]温州大学人文学院,浙江温州325035

出　　处：《合肥师范学院学报》2013年第2期1-9,共9页Journal of Hefei Normal University

基　　金：2010年国家社科基金项目"电子媒介时代时代文学变革与文论话语转型研究"(10CZW004);2009年教育部人文社科一般项目(09YJC751068)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：新时期文学理论的言说方式孕育了其内在的困境,即文学理论远离自己的研究对象文学而与哲学结为同盟,文论哲理化的倾向严重。而从诗学的演变规律来看,诗学的原初形态是从文学本文出发建构的本文诗学,因而返回本文自身就成为诗学走出困境的合法性道路,在这方面中西方的理论家已经做出了开创性的贡献,维柯、巴赫金、都从具体的文本中提炼出了具有普遍性的诗学思想,因而重建本文诗学在科学主义理性精神泛滥的今天提出非常重要,它一方面让诗学真正的回到文本自身,让诗学充满诗性,另一方面又与理性诗学形成一种互补,构成当前诗学发展的内在驱动力。The mode of expression of literary theory in the new age breeds the internal dilemma, and there is a serious tendency of philosophized literary theory, that is, literary theory stays far away from the subject of its study, and allies itself to philosophy. In terms of the evolution of poetics, the original morphology of poetics constructs the textual poetics from the literary text, therefore the return to the text itself has become the legitimate path for poetics to get out of the dilemma, in which the Chinese and Western theorists have already made groundbreaking contributions. Theorists like Giovanni Battista Vico, Bakhtin extracted universal poetics from the specific texts, therefore, it is very important to reconstruct textual poetics in the rampant age of the rational spirit of scientism, which enables poetics to return to the text itself and fills poetics with poetic nature on the one hand, and is complementary to rational poetics on the other hand,constituting the internal driving force in today＇s poetics development complementary.

关 键 词：文论困境 本文诗学 理性诗学诗性创造 

分 类 号：I022[文学—文学理论]