金圣叹与张竹坡评点比较研究——以《水浒传》《金瓶梅》重叠部分为例  

A Comparative Study of Jin Shen-tan and Zhang Zhu-po——Repeating Parts Between Outlaws of the Marsh and Golden Lotus

作　　者：邓雷[1] 许勇强[1] 

机构地区：[1]东华理工大学文法学院,南昌330013

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2013年第4期14-17,25,共5页Journal of Leshan Normal University

基　　金：江西省社科规划项目"多元文化语境下的水浒故事研究"(编号12WX02)前期成果(主持人:许勇强)

摘　　要：文章选取《水浒传》与《金瓶梅》重叠部分对金圣叹评点《水浒传》与张竹坡评点《金瓶梅》进行对比研究。主要分析二者评点在批评形式、批评风格、批评内容、批评文法以及批评主体情感意识上的异同,并探寻其中原因。可知金批集中于夹批处,而张批集中于眉批处;金批文风激情昂扬,而张批则平和中正;金批内容于文章处无所不入,而张批内容则多局限于文章人情物理;金批攀引甚多,经史子集无不入彀,而张批多随文下笔;金批多于文章细处着手,而张批却于文章大段精思处驻足。This article selects the overl ap part of Outlaws of the Marsh and Golden Lotus,take a comparative study of Jin Shengtan’s critic views on Outlaws of the Marsh and the Zhang Zhupo’s critic views on Golden Lotus.Mainly focused on the analysis of the similarities and differences between their critic form,critic style,critic content,critic grammar and critic subjects’emotional awareness,this paper explores the reasons attributed to these similarities and differences.The conclusion is that Jin’s comment is concentrated in the sentence caught but Zhang’s comment is concentrated in the books eyebrow.Jin’s comment is fierce,but Zhang’s comment is gentle;Jin’s contains a lot of contents,but Zhang’s contains only the feelings of contents;Jin’s contains many references,but Zhang’s just have half contents;Jin’s attention to detail,but Zhang’s is more concerned about the effect.

关 键 词：金圣叹 张竹坡 评点 异同 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]