检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院 [2]对外经济贸易大学FDI研究中心
出 处:《世界经济研究》2013年第5期67-73,89,共7页World Economy Studies
摘 要:本文选择Thomson Reuters数据库中1995~2011年中国企业跨境并购项目为研究样本,实证检验了目标国与中国的制度差异对中国企业跨境并购效率的影响,并首次检验了中国政府双边投资制度安排和中国企业自身跨境成功并购经历对上述影响的调节作用。实证结果表明:目标国与中国的制度差异是影响中国企业跨境并购效率的重要因素,中国政府的双边投资制度安排和中国企业自身的跨境成功并购经历能够调节目标国与中国制度差异对跨境并购效率的负面影响。为此,中国企业未来的跨境并购应重视并减少与目标国在法律规则、权力观念和契约理念上的差别,积累跨境并购的经验;中国政府应进一步推进双边投资制度安排以营造良好外部环境。Using transaction-level data from Thomson Reuters over the time 1995 ~ 2011,this paper empirically examines the effects of differences in formal and informal institutions between target nation and China on efficiency(the time taken for transaction completion after announcement) of China's cross-border M&A activities.Moreover,it studies how China's bilateral institutional arrangements on investment and China acquirer's past experience with completed acquisition deals moderate the effects of institutional differences.Results show that institutional differences have significant impact on the time duration taken for completion after announcement.In addition,China's bilateral institutional arrangements,as well as China acquirer's past experience,decrease the negative effects of institutional differences.Two practical implications of these findings are:China' s acquirers should pay more attention to the differences in laws,power and contract between target nation and China,at the meantime increase learning ability from past experience;Chinese government should promote bilateral institutional arrangements on investment to facilitate China's cross-border M&A.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7