检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西藏农牧学院,西藏林芝860000
出 处:《贵州农业科学》2013年第4期137-139,共3页Guizhou Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目"藏北退化草地综合整治技术与示范"(2011BAC09B03);西藏重大科技计划项目"西藏森林生态系统保护与恢复关键技术研究"(XZ2011002)
摘 要:为弄清我国森林凋落物生态学方面的研究状况,采用文献计量学等统计方法,对2000-2011年我国森林凋落物生态学研究文献进行了统计分析。结果表明:不同期刊的载文分布,发表文献达15篇以上的期刊有6种,占37.44%。不同年份发文量,2001年发表的文献量最少,仅12篇;2009年最多,达71篇。不同作者发文量,发文量少于5篇的作者最多,占50.91%;发文量为5篇的有11人,占12.56%;发文量为6~9篇的有15人,占24.65%;发文量为10篇或以上的仅5人,占11.87%。作者机构分布,在所搜集的438篇文献中,有11个机构在此期间发表的论文>10篇,占76.94%。研究内容,属于凋落物量(包括年凋落物量、现存量和生物量)的研究文献有339篇,达77.40%;属于凋落物分解/养分方面的论文有152篇,为34.70%;凋落物水分涵养、呼吸方面的文献有59篇,为13.14%,其他类占22.15%。研究对象,对人工林凋落物的研究接近1/2,为46.12%;自然林凋落物生态学研究为30.82%;其他类为23.06%。To study the situation of forest litter in China on the ecology, the research literature from 2000 to 2011 in China forest litter ecology were analyzed by bibliometric statistical methods. The results showed that the distribution of papers in different journals, there were six kinds of published literature above 15 journals, accounting for 37.44%. Issued in different years, the amount of literature published in 2001 was the least, only 12. Up to 2009, 71. Different authors of published papers, less than five of the largest, accounting for 50.91%; Eleven people have five articles published, accounting for 12.56%; 15 people have 6-9 articles, accounting for 24.65%; The quantity of the articles for 10 or more only five people, accounting for 11. 87%. Author distribution, in 438 articles collected, 11 agencies published papers more thanl0, accounting for 76.94%. The research content, which belonged to the litter amount (including annual litterfall amount, standing crop and biomass) research literature 339 articles, 77.40; The litter decomposition/nutrient papers were 152, 34.70%;Litter moisture conservation, breathing in the literature 59 papers, 13.14%, and other types accounted for 22.15%. The research object, research on plantation litter was close to 1/2, 46.12%; the nature of ecological forest litter was 30.82%; other class was 23.06%.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.143.199