检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘宪[1]
机构地区:[1]华东交通大学经管学院
出 处:《东北亚论坛》2013年第3期72-80,128,共9页Northeast Asia Forum
摘 要:当前中方对日、对韩货物贸易都存在巨额逆差;两个逆差都与贸易转移有关;都与商品档次差距有关;都需要用并不稳定的对美贸易顺差弥补。但在遭遇贸易壁垒方面、隐性逆差等方面两者存在区别。深思熟虑的产业升级换代,贸易政策创新,投资政策调整,保持汇率稳定等措施有助于同时减少两个逆差。适度放开对韩两用物项和技术出口,以温室气体减排要求为手段迫使日方让步等可以分别用于减少对日、对韩逆差。中方贸易逆差既是危机,也是机遇。At present,China has huge commodity deficit with Japan and Republic of Korea. Both the deficit,which is due to trade shift and quality gap,should be financed by China’s unstable trade surplus with the United States. However,the two are different in the perspective of trade barriers and invisible deficit. Both deficits could be relieved by deliberate upgrading domestic industry,innovating trade policy,adjusting investment policy,and maintaining the stabilization of the RMB exchange rates. Relaxing export control of commodities and techniques both of military and civilian uses in Sino -ROK trade and enforcing Japan to make compromises by reducing greenhouse gas discharge could be implemented to reduce the deficit with ROK and Japan. For China,commodity trade deficits with the two countries are not only crisis,but also opportunity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3