“三统并建说”与“综合创新论”——牟宗三与张岱年之中国文化构想比较  

"The Combination of Santong" and "the Comprehensive Innovation"——The Comparison of the Chinese Culture Conception between Mou Zongsan and Zhang Dainian

作　　者：陈火青[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州师范学院文学院,贵州贵阳550018

出　　处：《贵州师范学院学报》2013年第2期1-5,共5页Journal of Guizhou Education University

摘　　要：牟宗三与张岱年都对中国文化之未来充满关切,都基于自己的哲学对中国文化发展提出了构想,开创了中国文化复兴的两个理论典范。从他们对中国文化的特质或基本精神的把握,对中国传统文化何以未能开出民主和科学的追问,以及对中国未来文化发展的构想等三个方面进行疏朗比较,从而可以更鲜明地看到,牟、张二人的"三统并建说"与"综合创新论"之路各有其深刻与不足之处。他们的构想为后人的研究提供了丰富的思想资源。Mou Zongsan and Zhang Dainian are full of concerns and expectations with the future of Chinese cul- ture. Based on their philosophy, they had put forward the theory of creating renaissance of Chinese culture and two theoretical models. By comparing the three aspects including their mastering of the essence and basic spirit of Chinese culture, their questions of Chinese traditional cuhure~ failure in advocating democracy and science, and their concep- tion of future development of Chinese culture, we can find both merits and shortcoming in their ＂combination of San- ton,,＂ and ＂the com^rehensive innovation＂. Their conception provides rich thought resources for future research.

关 键 词：三统并建说 综合创新论 牟宗三 张岱年 文化思想 比较 

分 类 号：G04[文化科学]