检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《西部医学》2013年第2期278-279,共2页Medical Journal of West China
摘 要:目的评价经直肠超声(TRUS)诊断前列腺癌(PCA)的效果。方法回顾性分析前列腺癌患者78例,其中应用经腹超声(TAUS)检查者43例,经直肠超声(TRUS)检查者35例,以病理学诊断为金标准,计算两种方法的检出率及漏诊率。结果经腹超声检出PCA13例,检出率约30.2%,漏诊率为69.8%;经直肠超声检出PCA 29例,检出率82.8%,漏诊率为17.2%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经直肠超声对PCA的检出率明显高于经腹超声,提示TRUS检查前列腺在临床上有着广泛的应用价值,可为前列腺癌的诊断及治疗提供更大帮助。Objective To evaluate the effect on the transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods A retrospective analysis of 78 cases of prostate cancer patients, in which the application of transabdom- inal ultrasound (TAUS) examination in 43 cases, transreetal ultrasound (TRUS) examination in 35 eases, the pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, two methods for calculating the detection rate and the rate of missed diagnosis. Results The transabdominal ultrasound detection of prostate cancer (PCA) in 13 cases, the detection rate of about 30.2%, the missed diagnosis rate was 69.8% ; the detection of prostate cancer by transreetal ultrasound (PCA) in 29 cases, the detection rate of 82.8%, the missed diagnosis rate was 17.2%. Conclusion Transrectal Ultrasonography in the detection of prostate cancer detection rates were significantly higher than transabdominal ultrasound(P〈0.05).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229