检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈华[1] 赵文[1] 毛睿[1] 南楠[1] 丁丽霞[1] 金少鸿[1]
出 处:《药物分析杂志》2013年第5期881-884,893,共5页Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis
摘 要:目的:比较不同晶型制剂之间利福平溶出度的差异。方法:采用中国药典溶出度桨法装置测定溶出曲线,3种不同pH的溶出介质体积为900 mL,溶出介质温度为37℃,桨转速为75 r.min-1;使用适当的HPLC方法对利福平的溶出度进行测定。结果:大多数Ⅰ晶型制剂比作为参比的Ⅱ晶型制剂所得到的溶出度结果相似或较高。结论:排除制剂工艺的影响后,Ⅰ晶型制剂与作为参比的Ⅱ晶型在溶出度结果上相似或更优。Objective: To compare the differences of the dissolution profiles of two crystalline types of the fixed dose combinations(FDCs) of rifampin. Methods:Three dissolution profiles in media(900 mL)with different pH were obtained using the dissolution determination apparatus of paddle method in ChP. The temperature of the media was 37 ℃ and the rotation speed was 75 r·min^-1. A proper HPLC method was selected and used to determine the dissolution. Results:Most dissolution results of the FDCs made by crystalline type Ⅰ were similar to or higher than those reference substances made by crystalline type Ⅱ. Conclusion:It indicates that Rifampin of crystalline type Ⅰ hasthe similar or better dissolubility compared with the type Ⅱ , excluding the influence of pharmaceutical technologies.
关 键 词:半合成抗结核药 利福平 多晶型制剂 相似因子 溶出度差异 崩解时限
分 类 号:R917[医药卫生—药物分析学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222