物权行为独立性与无因性的实证法考察  

Investigation of Positive Law into the Independence and Non-Available Reason of Real Right Behavior

作　　者：王焱 汤静雅[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民保险集团,北京100084 [2]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《求是学刊》2013年第3期85-91,共7页Seeking Truth

摘　　要：我国实证法上对物权行为独立性与无因性理论承认与否,向来有所争议。通过实证法分析,单从买卖致所有权移转的角度,以《物权法》与《合同法》对此的相关规定,可证明大部分实证法法条承认债权行为不可导致物权变动,另有部分法条则肯定物权行为的存在。而对于抽象原则,实证法法条持否定态度。It is disputed about the acknowledgement of the independence and non-available reason of real right behavior in positive law in our country. Through analysis of positive law, only from the perspective of the transfer of ownership, relevant regulations in ＂Real Right Law＂ and ＂Contract Law＂ can prove that most articles in positive law acknowledge that debting behavior can not change the real right, while other articles acknowledge the existence of real right behavior. As for abstract principles, articles in positive law take a negative attitude.

关 键 词：买卖合同 所有权变动 物权行为 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]