检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋洁云[1] 刘芳宏[1] 马军[1] 陈远帆[1] 王海俊[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学儿童青少年卫生研究所,北京100191
出 处:《中国实验诊断学》2013年第5期802-805,共4页Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81172683)
摘 要:目的比较两种不同方法提取的基因组DNA的纯度、产量和后续实验效果。方法采用酚/氯仿法和盐析法两种方法直接从全血中提取基因组DNA,并采用电泳、PCR和基质支持的激光释放/电离飞行时间质谱分析(MALDI-TOF MS)方法进行检测。结果酚/氯仿法提取的基因组DNA纯度高于盐析法(P<0.001),但两组纯度平均值都高于1.80;没有发现两种方法提取的DNA浓度存在差异(P=0.819)。两组DNA在电泳中都没有出现明显拖尾现象,均很容易扩增出胰岛素诱导基因2片段,并且在MALDI-TOF MS检测中,两组DNA样本结果没有明显差异。结论酚/氯仿法和盐析法提取的基因组DNA质量无明显差异。相比酚/氯仿法,盐析法能简便、快速、无毒地进行DNA提取,适合于大规模的分子生物学实验。Objective To detect the purity,quantity and follow-up experimental effects of DNA extracted with two methods. Methods Extract genomic DNA with phenol ehlorgform method and salting out method,and detect the DNA samples with electrophoresis, PCR and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/ Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrome try (MALDI-TOF MS). Results Purity of DNA extracted with phenol chloroform method was higher than that with salting out method,with both mean purity higher than 1.80. The quantity was not significantly different between two methods (P--0. 819). The DNA samples did not smear on gel,and the PCR test of INSIG2 gene and MALDI-TOF MS test did not show difference between DNA isolated with two methods. Conclusion There was no difference between DNA samples isolated with phenol chloroform method and salting out method. Compared to phenol chloroform method, salting out method was much simpler, more quick and harmless, and was applicable to molecular biology experiments with large scale.
分 类 号:R394[医药卫生—医学遗传学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145