话语分析之于法律文化研究拓新  

Discourse Analysis for Legal Culture Research Innovation

作　　者：陈子远[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学,武汉430072

出　　处：《电子科技大学学报（社科版）》2013年第2期53-57,共5页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社科基金项目"中国宪法变迁与中央政府变革:历史与未来"的阶段性成果(12YJC820009)

摘　　要：中国法律文化研究由勃兴而忽亡,研究结论不能合理解释当代法律文化现象是根本原因,方法论没有革故鼎新是主要症结。文化是一套规则体系,话语是一种权力支配规则。流于"貌阅"而不能深入挖潜的研习定势下,学者们不免惑于统治者编造的中国法律史叙事话语。儒学意识形态下道德决定论为核心的话语体系支配了人们对中国传统法的"真理"性认识和价值判断。源于批判语言学的话语分析方法,有助于人们穿越意识形态的遮蔽,解读、诠释或重现文本与话语的文化内涵。Research of Chinese legal culture grew vigorously and declined suddenly, the main reason is that the research conclusion cannot reasonably explain contemporary legal culture phenomenon, and no innovation of methodology is the main sticking point. Culture is a set of rules system, and discourses are a kind of power control rules. Judging by the appearance instead of in-depth study, the scholars may be confused in the narrative discourse of Chinese legal history created by rulers of ancient China. Discourse system of Confucianism ideology with a core of moral determinism dominated the people＇s ＂truth＂ knowledge and value judgment on Chinese tradition law. Critical discourse analysis from linguistics methods can help people read, interpret or recreate text and discourse cultural connotation through the cover of ideology.

关 键 词：法律文化 方法论 话语分析 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]